Naloxone paper response
I'm posting a response to Doleac and Mukherjee's paper on the moral hazard of naloxone. I think the paper is wrong, but I tried to be smarter about it on my second look at it than on my first. (Which inspired irrationally inflamed tweets; now I'm sticking to rational inflammation.)
Here are the links to the files:
Main response: a lengthy discussion of the paper.
Appendix: a brief discussion of the idea of "moral hazard" and why, even though it's a jargon term and not a description of a person, it still bugs me in this context.
And because it would not be a Mu Receptor Mixtape post without a musical addition, I attach:
Here are the links to the files:
Main response: a lengthy discussion of the paper.
Appendix: a brief discussion of the idea of "moral hazard" and why, even though it's a jargon term and not a description of a person, it still bugs me in this context.
* * *
And because it would not be a Mu Receptor Mixtape post without a musical addition, I attach: